Overview

I apply Earth observation to concrete environmental questions: what is growing where, how vegetation responds to rainfall, where forest carbon is heading and how fast a coastline is retreating. Every answer is fused from several sensors and validated before it is reported.

What you get

  • Crop-type and crop-condition maps at 10 m
  • Field-level vegetation forecasts driven by rainfall and soil moisture
  • Forest biomass and carbon forecasts under climate scenarios for REDD+
  • Shoreline-change forecasts with uncertainty
  • Land-degradation and mining-impact assessments with clear, quotable figures
  • Reproducible notebooks and technical reports

Who this helps

  • Agricultural programmes & supply chains

    Including cocoa and smallholder systems in West Africa.

  • Forest-carbon & REDD+ projects

    Needing biomass trends and forward-looking scenarios.

  • Coastal authorities

    Monitoring erosion hotspots before infrastructure is lost.

  • NGOs proving impact

    Monitoring land and forests with satellite data and participatory ground truth.

How I approach it

  1. 01

    Frame the environmental indicator

    Agree what is measured (NDVI trend, crop type, biomass, shoreline position), at what scale and for which decision.

  2. 02

    Fuse complementary sources

    Sentinel-1 and -2, Landsat, GEDI LiDAR, SMAP, ERA5, CHIRPS, ESA CCI soil moisture and UAV orthomosaics, each covering another's blind spots.

  3. 03

    Ground it in the field

    Participatory plot-level ground truth, UAV-derived labels and DSAS transects anchor the models to reality.

  4. 04

    Model change over time

    LSTMs, Bayesian LSTMs and temporal graph neural networks capture lagged responses and trends; scenario runs extend them under RCP pathways.

  5. 05

    Validate spatially and quantify uncertainty

    Spatial-block cross-validation and held-out areas, with uncertainty reported alongside every forecast.

  6. 06

    Translate into decisions

    Clear figures and hotspot maps, such as "32.0% of the district in measurable decline", that stakeholders can use directly.

Evidence from my work

  • 32.0%Of Obuasi district in measurable vegetation decline (2018–2024)
  • R² > 0.50Parcel-level NDVI forecasts, MAE below 0.07
  • < 8 mMAE for 3-month shoreline forecasts
  • 333.9 km²Under automated change detection for Rainforest Alliance

Figures come from the Obuasi, Agricultural Digital Twin and Coastal Erosion projects and from Rainforest Alliance work in 2024.

Selected work

LSTMNDVI

Agricultural Digital Twin

LSTM forecasting of 10 m Sentinel-2 NDVI from CHIRPS rainfall and ESA CCI soil moisture; R² above 0.50 and MAE below 0.07 at parcel level.

View case study
REDD+GNN

SMART-FOREST

Fuses Sentinel-1/2, GEDI LiDAR, SMAP and ERA5 in object-based and temporal GNNs to forecast above-ground biomass over 10-year horizons under RCP scenarios.

View case study
Swin-UNETRShoreline

Coastal Erosion Digital Twin

3-month shoreline forecasts (MAE below 8 m) from Sentinel-1/2, Landsat, UAV orthomosaics and wave climatology, validated against DSAS transects.

View case study
LandsatTime Series

Obuasi Vegetation Decline

Boundary-clipped USGS Landsat NDVI trend: 32.0% of the district in measurable decline (9.2% strong, 22.8% moderate), concentrated around mining.

View case study

What sets my work apart

  • 1

    Multi-sensor by default

    Radar, optical, LiDAR and climate data together, rather than a single index.

  • 2

    Local landscapes, real examples

    Built on West African systems such as cocoa farms, the Atewa range and Lake Volta shorelines.

  • 3

    Forecasts with error bars

    Forward-looking products always carry their uncertainty.

Tools & standards

  • Sentinel-1 / 2
  • Landsat
  • GEDI
  • SMAP
  • ERA5
  • CHIRPS
  • ESA CCI
  • Google Earth Engine
  • LSTM
  • Temporal GNNs
  • DSAS

Common questions

Can you work in data-poor regions?

Yes. Most of my work is in Ghana, where cloud cover and sparse labels are normal. Radar, open datasets and participatory ground truth fill the gaps.

How accurate will the maps be?

That is measured, not promised. Accuracy is reported from spatial cross-validation and field checks, so the figure reflects new areas rather than the training data.

Do you publish the methods?

Wherever possible, yes, as reproducible notebooks built on open-source tools.